>>32639

> Morality System in ME
> had the conversation option written differently than what Shephard said

God, i'm SO with you for this point. I was pissed of by that shit almost from the start of the game, you could only guess what sheperd actually says. O wait, sometimes he even said something entirely different than the thing you picked, alas for me.
And for the moral-stuff, after playing ~10 hours and reading that you MUST choose a side and/or you CANNOT even answer with the other side pissed me off. Heck, i got me a mod where both were at 100% so i could answer how i liked.
What is this shit? If i want to be nice with some npc and want to fuck with another i will do so. But the logic says "nono, you are good/bad, you can't be the other way!

> FNV

You mentioned your way of simply killing almost everything later in game. Funny, was the same expierience for me. At first, i tried to understand the motives for each faction or important person i found and thought about how to handle with em. Later on i just thought fuck, they're all spupid, it's the best otion to clear them from the surface and rule it myself.
Of course, that ended up with a wasteland almost cleaned up from human being, leaving only some minor support habitats. Thinking about it, it's an ending that has some ironical logic itself ;)

>do u like classical music, and if yes, which types?

It's pretty much the only musical tradition I am interested in.

I mostly listen to Baroque, late Romantic, and Modern.

>do you attend live concerts?

Yes.

>with what frequency?

Once every five years or so. I live in a sub-civilized city, which means it's safer to stay home. Next year I hope to move to a civilized one, and then I will certainly attend much more regularly. Ideally, I'd go to a concert every week.

>>33500
In the really old does it actually was true that you could get to loot somebody else's country or citystate in certain times and places. Also in a defensive war like I said total war has existed a lot longer so being invaded by a hostile neighbor really did mean the men would be slaughtered and the women sold into slavery which is the one time it's not needed to lie or manipulate people to fight because it is an existential threat, but typically the ones doing the invading needed to be manipulated.

Also warfare you keep forgetting only steeped breeding disease and pandemics in the last like 80 years thanks to modern medicine. Before that and even as recently as WWI a war meant the civilian population could then enjoy the fruits of a decimating disease killing millions of people although to be fair trade and urbanization had as much if not at times more to do with that and the great bulk of the superstitious and ignorant people probably hadn't fully connected vast movements of people with causing huge disease outbreaks.

Anyone with any sense would not join a war. It is disastrous for the fighting parties involved. The only thing that really benefits you directly in the short term is the same as a pandemic which is so many people can get killed that it frees up jobs and spoils including land that the survivors of the catastrophe can pick over, and that is only if whatever disgusting feudal lord or government allows you to keep it. Otherwise no war is thoroughly stupid and also continually beating back people tends to sink everyone's conditions rather than raising themselves and each other up out of poverty.

Like the Napeolonic wars. What, praytell, did any of the soldiers really benefit from all that? What was even the pointing of freezing to death on the outskirts of Russia? What is the point of starving and dying of typhus in some God forgotten land on the outskirts of a burning village where wolves fuck? Nothing, unless you are already part of that caste and that caste tending to treat it as a "gentleman's game" which is partly why they treating captured enemy officers so well because at the end of the day all these guys were on the same elite team getting the peasants who are their true adversaries tricked into killing each other over nothing.