/int/ – No shittings during wörktime
„There is no place like home“

File (max. 4)
Return to
(optional)
  • Allowed file extensions (max. size 25 MB or specified)
    Images:  BMP, GIF, JPG, PNG, PSD   Videos:  FLV, MP4, WEBM  
    Archives:  7Z, RAR, ZIP   Audio:  FLAC, MP3, OGG, OPUS  
    Documents:  DJVU (50 MB), EPUB, MOBI, PDF (50 MB)  
  • Please read the Rules before posting.
  • Make sure you are familiar with the Guide to Anonymous Posting.

Hide No. 35878 [Reply]
18 kB, 389 × 413
The rationale behind the submachine gun was that the gentler recoil of a pistol cartridge allows one to fire full auto while still hitting the target. Pre-ban fully automatic firearms are prohibitively expensive for civilian ownership in the USA, but currently "binary triggers" that fire twice per trigger pull (once on pull, once on release) are available, which makes SMG-like weapons again a viable choice for civilian ownership. However in recent decades the proliferation of cheap and light body armor has led to SMGs falling out of favor with law enforcement and military users with short-barreled rifles becoming increasingly popular. Do imitation SMGs have any place in the current-day USA or elsewhere for that matter?
>>
No. 51382
>>51362
That is not necessarily a plus.
I think you overemphasize armor penetration a bit too much.
>>
No. 51388 Kontra
3,2 MB, 110 pages
>>51382
Like always it depends on the intended use.
Like for hunting I would definitely get something big, as facing an angry hog I would rather have a bigger bullet than more.
Conversely, if you really want to penetrate armor, of course using the round specifically developed for that would probably be advantageous.

That said, just for shooting people dead really everything works. See file attached, chapter "Stopping Power". Shot placement is much more important than caliber.
>>
No. 51391
>>51388
A well placed shot is also a hell of a lot harder to do when they're all wearing kevlar helmets and body armor. Of course yeah most people get their knowledge from movies and video games and movies and video games are flat out wrong. To this day it mystifies me where the idea came from for suppressors to have that meme sound they use in every movie and game. Shotguns also don't spread out as much and even if they did a 10 or 12 gauge slug will nearly blast a limb off.
>>
No. 51433
>>51388
What raises my interest is that this bullet apparently works for large hogs. This video is promotional material so inherently suspect but aside from a guy talking it also contains what it claims to be footage of a one-shot stop on a 420 pound boar at a distance of 45 yards; a one shot stop of a 300 pound boar at 25 yards; a one shot stop of a 480 pound boar at 20 yards; a one shot stop of a 448 pound boar at 20 yards; a two shot stop of a 313 pound boar at 40 yards; a two shot stop of a 437 pound boar at 35 yards; a two shot stop of a 358 pound boar at 30 yards; a one shot stop of a 325 pound boar at 50 yards; and a one shot stop of a 550 pound boar at 45 yards. Of course this isn't absolute proof that it works. The footage could be fake, or even if it is real it could be a small selection from many attempts that failed but weren't shown, or the man doing the demonstration might be an unusually good shot since with good enough bullet placement any bullet can kill anything in North America -- in 1953 the world record for largest grizzly bear kill was taken with a brain shot with .22LR through a weak point in the bear's skull. Nevertheless I am intrigued.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPie5J8Ji7Q (640x360 res version is 28 MB file so too big to upload)

Hide No. 40114 [Reply]
233 kB, 960 × 639
51 kB, 400 × 400
Good evening, my fellow Ernsts.

I would like to host a show for /int/, similar to the one currently running under the name "Ernste Folgen" every second Sunday for /b/.
And tomorrow, we'll give it a shot.

I would like to talk with Ernst about beauty; what does Ernst consider beautiful, how beauty may or may not be to the eye of the beholder and how the ideal beauty has changed throughout time and whatever Ernst would like to add.

Ernst is warmly invited to participate in the debate either here by posting in the thread of by calling me through Skype where you would find me as "colmesrey"

We'll start tomorrow, Saturday the 4th of April at UTC+3 00:00.

radio.ernstchan.xyz:8000
>>
No. 51350
>>51346
Identifying the evil trespasser is a lot harder than you may think: the one making a shit post is only the tip of the iceberg, the real deal is the hidden portion of the userbase that approves of it.
In reddit terms, it's the people upvoting the shit post.

This leads to massive issues as moderation usually attempts to remove the visible issue, gets hit by a massive and completely unexpected backlash, and decides that clearly they were in the wrong and that the shit post is actually something good for the community.

A further issue is coordinated bad actors, such as the people organizing raids and moderation takeovers in their off-site secret clubs.
There's a reason reddit went to hell so fast, and it sure wasn't the administration.

Anonymous forums have less issues dealing with both attacks compared to standard forums, samefaggotry is assumed to be the default so it's hard to push change via short-term numberical advantage.
>>
No. 51358
>>51350
Two days after the show and my Karma is so low I can only do one post every 15 minutes. Oh yeah and someone reported me for being a dick basically.
>>
No. 51360
37 kB, 800 × 667
>>51358
>and my Karma is so low I can only do one post every 15 minutes. Oh yeah and someone reported me for being a dick
Suddenly imageboards feel like a safe space from harrassment.
>>
No. 51383
>>51358
That's reddit for you.
It's not quite as bad as Facebook or Twitter in terms of promoting cult-like behaviour, but it's close.

Hide No. 48414 [Reply]
8 kB, 189 × 266
How do we find the kingdom of Heaven from within, as Jesus spake? me have deep and tumultuous psych problems which are affecting my body adversely and more specifically the gut (IBS), and medication is just making me suffer too. I am thinking if we accessed our kingdoms from within, we could conquer our personal demons which afflict us all, and yes I am willing to believe this thing but I do not know how to access it and Jesus is kinda vague, so, I humbly request your help Ernst.
>>
No. 51271
482 kB, 1200 × 2280
>>48432
I'm not entirely positive what you meant by this post. At surface glance neither post seems to be contradicting each other.

>>48583
Thanks
>>
No. 51333
113 kB, 634 × 775
>How do we find the kingdom of Heaven from within, as Jesus spake?
There is no kingdom of Heaven. Your soul is not transcendental and there is nowhere you will be sent to once your lowly form withers away. If there is a God, or some superior creator figure, it is only natural that he doesn't care about our individual actions. There is no point in you judging ants, there is no point in God judging you. Perhaps at some point our creator cared about his creation, if it was even a conscious act but he doesn't care about you specifically. An indifferent being that created a fundamentally unfair world built on suffering is not a being to worship.

In Christianity, Man is blamed for suffering. If what pains you isn't the action of another human being, if it's something beyond anyone's control - then you must also blame Man. Worst case scenario, it'll be chalked up to God working in mysterious ways which is also your faul, after all, man not being in Eden is also our fault.

The idea that mankind is fundamentally flawed, weak and composed of a great mass of lowly sinners is a good starting point. The problem is that the very material realities of our world and the biological realities of being a human being are two never ending sources of suffering. It's unavoidable.

[Show 2 more lines]

>>
No. 51334
>>51333
>The problem is that the very material realities of our world and the biological realities of being a human being are two never ending sources of suffering. It's unavoidable.
This is nothing contrary to the Christian view of the world ("biological realities" which lead to human suffering is just a secular description of "fallen human nature").

Gnosticism is fine and all, but the Brahman pill is greater. There is no self or other, all consciousness is manifestation of the same being. This applies as well to any possible creator being. Hating him is as not-right as hating your fellow man, regardless of their deeds. But obsessive concern with the desires of such a being is also not-right.

Furthermore, concern with the afterlife is not-right. As consciousness embodied in animal form, we are of course concerned with death. But being continues regardless, and if you glimpse the divine reality, you see that your animal fears are unimportant.
>>
No. 51351
A strong sense of humour is the soul's transgression against the normalization of evil

Hide No. 51280 [Reply]
100 kB, 510 × 361
257 kB, 1053 × 744
603 kB, 1053 × 744
411 kB, 2048 × 1448
In this thread, I will post cartroons drawn by German boomer cartoonist Götz Widenroth and try to explain them as good as I can. Feel free to contribute boomer-humor from your country, or from Germany or anything else.

1
File title is
>green_peadophile_pederasts_child_sex.jpg
Person to the left is a priest affixed to a crucifix. Sign over his head says
>Hear hangs a child molester. t. the green party
On the right, we see a toad. Her hairdo and warts make clear that this toad is supposed to be a caricature of green party politician Claudia Roth. Sign over her head says
>Here hangs the green part. t. a molested child.
The green thing in the toads mouth is a bludgeon. It is labeled "the moral bludgeon". In German "The moral bludgeon" is a figure of speech that symbolises the judgement "x is immoral" applied as an argument. The text at the bottom says

[Show 11 more lines]

>>
No. 51295
Is the guy butthurt or what? Why does he bother with it? It looks like the onion but meant to be serious.
>>
No. 51298 Kontra
>>51295
It's basically the german version of a magatard, of course he's butthurt
>>
No. 51317 Kontra
132 kB, 640 × 478
180 kB, 476 × 640
>>51295
In my opinion, the assessment is correct. It looks like the onion, it is meant to be serious, he is butthurt.

What is he butthurt about? I do not know. To me, his nudes look like a 15 year old horny kid did them. So maybe he is butthurt about not getting laid, or about his own inability to get perpsective and proportion right, despite trying for decades. But I do not think he is aware of the second part.
>>
No. 51347
>>51295
He is some philosemite alt-right boomer with rather mediocre art and humor.

Hide No. 49789 Systemkontra [Reply]
872 kB, 2276 × 3200
Ernst The Great, transmitting his (blog) messages across time and space!
>>
No. 51069 Kontra
>>51067
Dude, I'm underfucked as hell. Maybe she as well but still this is slow pace. I already made sure that the distance between us is minimal despite corona. She already sent me messages, good signs in a way.
Also my ex was often quiet, moaning was there ofc, but not all females scream so that other tenants can hear it. Also yeah, sports helps with stamina and better sex overall I guess.
>>
No. 51070 Kontra
>>51069
Godspeed, Ernst. Bums sie, bis ihre Mulle sich weitet!
>>
No. 51071 Kontra
86 kB, 501 × 284
>>51067
ignore this guy
>>
No. 51220
>>51071
This is the third time I scrolled by this week and still cannot figure out what part you thought of as cringe but then again the today thread in general turned into a real dumpster fire. Are you guys all locked inside and getting stressed out or something?
...fugg I wish the governor would order me to be mandatory neet for 2 weeks solid.

Hide No. 50733 [Reply]
307 kB, 531 × 710
From the synoptic gospels it's pretty clear that Jesus is subordinate to God.

"So He said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God." Matt 19:17

"but to sit on My right hand and on My left is not Mine to give, but it is for those for whom it is prepared by My Father.” Matt 20:23

"Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me; nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done." Luke 22:42

Where then did the idea that Jesus is God come from? He never said it, although he let his disciples worship him, but even so, as the Son of God ("Then those who were in the boat came and worshiped Him, saying, “Truly You are the Son of God.”" Matt 14:33). It seems at most he was the Son of God.
>>
No. 50748
It mostly was constructed over time as theologists dealed with what to make of Father, Son, Holy Spirit and their relation to God.
I'm not aware if there was any practical or somewhat logical need for this development. To me it seems more likely that the trinity became the dominant view in a more profane way, such as followers of theologist teaching it simply gaining power within the church.
>>
No. 50796
65 kB, 388 × 515
>In 321, Arius was denounced by a synod at Alexandria for teaching a heterodox view of the relationship of Jesus to God the Father. Because Arius and his followers had great influence in the schools of Alexandria—counterparts to modern universities or seminaries—their theological views spread, especially in the eastern Mediterranean. By 325, the controversy had become significant enough that the Emperor Constantine called an assembly of bishops, the First Council of Nicaea, which condemned Arius's doctrine and formulated the original Nicene Creed of 325.

Also, learned something new:
>According to legendary accounts, debate became so heated that at one point, Arius was struck in the face by Nicholas of Myra, who would later be canonized.

Lol, Santa Claus was pretty rowdy.
>>
No. 51003
Alright time for some explaining on my end. Jesus is God the son, God is God the father and then the final one is God the holy spirit. Now to identify these three we simply have to use scripture to understand. I will be approaching this from the trinitarian perspective because I think it both aligns significantly with the bible and it makes my position stronger. The truth of the matter is that Jesus is God in the flesh
1 John 4:2
"Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:"
Moreover denying this means that you are considered an antichrist in the Eyes of God
1 John 4:3
"And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world."
So clearly Jesus is Godly in some form or fashion, Now this is where it becomes interesting, God the father is a spirit. That means that he is incorporeal and never changing. The gospels back this up.
John 4:24
"God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth."
This explains why God the father has more authority and power than Jesus because the spirit is stronger and thus more able than the flesh is, Hence why Jesus is considered the Son of God. Now it's time to go back... All the way to Genesis 1 where God makes man within his image.

[Show 7 more lines]

>>
No. 51045
>>50733
In retrospect I realize I misinterpreted Matt 19:17. Jesus doesn't deny that he's God, rather he's even hinting to it...

Hide No. 50961 [Reply]
8 kB, 400 × 400
Why is hedonism bad? Why is seeking inward-directed pleasure for its own sake bad?
>>
No. 51035
>>51034
>No experience is fundamentally "better" or "worse" than another, they're all just sensations.
If I take a blowtorch to your balls, I doubt you'll maintain that position for long.

You take the philosophical alienation thing too far. At a level beyond embodied human consciousness, it's true that you can't necessarily categorize one feeling or another as "good" or "bad". But we are human, and your experience of reality is inseparable from that reality. I can't think of an appropriate word, but intellectualizing beyond that is a very high level of "not-doing-it-right" or "not-getting-it" (in my humble opinion).

As regards a more limited version of your position: Yes, suffering is not inherently bad. A life without a certain amount of suffering suffers for it. But there are depths of suffering with no redemptive potential, which can only do lasting harm. Lifting weights strengthens you; ripping your arm off means you're a cripple for life; shooting you in the head means you're dead.
>>
No. 51036
>>51027
That's a nice theoretical system, but how do you expect it to work?

For starters, how do you put this system into place? This will never be implemented by a standard republican government, and violent revolution privileges centralized and ordered movements that are able and willing to impose their will on others. The anarchists in Spain got BTFO and purged by Stalinists. IIRC, every single successful leftist revolution has resulted in rule by a centralized communist party apparatus.

Why and how will the next time be different?
>>
No. 51037
>>51035
I always argue the general case, rather than specifying a million exceptions.
You can apply the Principle of Charity and take away the specific meaning yourself.

I think it simplifies the discussion and prevents things from spiraling into hair splitting specifics. Does not mean I myself subscribe to the super general case, it's just more pragmatic to consider things "in isolation", because otherwise nothing can be productively discussed.

just my style, though, you might disagree.
>>
No. 51061 Kontra
>>51036
Organization of the working class and general strike.

Also, don't appeal to status quo as evidence of merit. The assumptions of the capitalist order are every bit as absurd, if not more so than many socialist ones, it's just that Capital has managed a great PR campaign and tricked people into thinking it's the default. Likewise, why will the next attempt at moderate liberal democracy work? Every other time it's been tried you end up with literal fascism or an oligarchy. It's not really a great track record, and it's had a lot more cracks at it.

Hide No. 36476 [Reply]
50 kB, 1229 × 940
90 kB, 484 × 750
180 kB, 784 × 1280
Step 1: Post Random Pictures
Step 2: ?????
Step 3: Profit!
>>
No. 50386 Kontra
S
>>
No. 50387
We did it reddit!
>>
No. 51022
32 kB, 415 × 480
133 kB, 750 × 668
36 kB, 600 × 400
70 kB, 720 × 900
Pope Benedict XVI(now pope emeritus) loved cats, but tradition forbid him from keeping one in his papal apartment.
>>
No. 51364 Kontra
>>50387
Go back to your cancerous shithole. No, I don't mean reddit, you retarded 4cancer.

Hide No. 37402 Systemkontra [Reply]
1,4 MB, 1962 × 3000
We're back since the old one is on systemkontra now.

This thread is for discussing tabletop gaming, though experience shows that it's mostly been tabletop RPG discussion in various forms ranging from play experience, rules discussion and design talk. We currently have a game group ongoing, based out of a discord server here: https://discord.gg/ZGmpJe9 feel free to drop in. We actually play on most Saturdays at 0600 Zulu.

What are you lot up to in this field lately?
>>
No. 51006
>>51002
I think I'll be there.
It's hard to say right now, but I'm currently in a "slightly fucked up" state, rather than "have to put conscious and deliberate effort into turning around in my bed because my leg is sore" state, so that's looking good for 12 hours from now.
Fingers crossed lol.
>>
No. 51012 Kontra
>>51006
Very inconvenient timing to have a comedown.
It's 1 AM here and I'm wide awake.
I don't think I can make it, sorry guys.
If I do, consider it a miracle.
>>
No. 51014
>>51012
I'll be there to see if a miracle happens. And if not then that's okay, no pressure.
>>
No. 51025
I'll be there too. I got a few things that we can work out Mano a Mano besides. One advantage of such an autosomal system I guess.

Hide No. 50570 [Reply]
714 kB, 1920 × 1080
where can I find this suit?
>>
No. 50571
Years ago, there was an idea for how to use the internet to sell products. All TV shows would be interactive. While watching, a link would be available to purchase the actor's clothing, the food they were eating, the furniture- everything.

This idea never materialized, though. Sad. It might have helped in this exact situation.
>>
No. 50573
>>50570
Its just a suit blazer with a white dress shirt under it
>>
No. 50598
>hey guys where can I find this random white dress shirt and blackish coat the guy is wearing in this pic
I can't even see the hem dude. Why didn't you just look up "what dinner jackets does Ed Norton wear"?
>>
No. 50724
Ask your Schneider