>>8483
Wait no that is not what I meant apparently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateral_thinking
hmm http://chuckslamp.com/index.php/2009/04/11/non-linearthinking/
It is like there are spiderwebs of neural connections from which each starting point is only linearly subjective from its own non-objective viewpoint, ergo necessitating the usage of all points of light on the spectrum in order to see and analyze a particular situation or object of inquiry. It is a process by which you are not so easily duped by your own inherently flawed and subjective perceptions whereby multiple blindfolded people would touch a part of an elephant and come to wildly different conclusions as to the nature of an animal. When you see a hologram you are only looking at it from one vantage point, and likewise, a person on the other end of the room would see a very different static image from which only a vague conjecture and stipulations are possible based on predictions of what you expect the other side to look like, which is necessarily subjective. As such, this is the problem with looking at both God and the self, or Soul, and is a problem with understanding what is the geist of life and creativity and reality generally. In other words, you have to look at the system as a whole, which the main problem is looking at a puzzle and knowing the ultimate picture you're going for, it's just the tedium of finding the right pieces to fill it in.

>Thich Naht Hanh compares such instances of knowing God, or becoming enlightened, like a dialogue between a land turtle and a fish. One might represent enlightenment/believing in a God and the other perhaps with their own way of seeing the world and obtaining enlightenment/God.

>Fish- Look here turtle, how I can drink this water and breathe it to give me life. Breathe this water, shelled friend and surely you can believe/become enlightened.
>Turtle-Look here fish, how I can inhale this air and breathe it to give me life. Breathe this air, scaled friend and surely you can believe/become enlightened.

>As you can see, both have defined their own type of enlightenment but neither seem to understand the other's tactics of doing so. Just as humans. We can try to explain all we want on how to believe/disbelieve in this or that or even on how to become enlightened.

And so on and so forth.

>>8463

>Exactly like I said before in this thread but you didn't believe me. Here I even got an interview with a blizzard developer:

I not sayed you was incorrect, I said that there was like 9000 different variants of plot, characters and events, and most of changes come from technical stuff. One of Alpha versions of Warcraft3 included actual Lord of the Clans plot in them (most probably one that was still more RPG than RTS) that slowely moved to events of Warcraft 3. There was other Alpha plots, but about them knowed much less exept some facts, like that games also focused on goblins and exept them as race had fully playable campain and related locations. Also there renders or Garona done for example, but there absoluetly no clue what she suposed to do in this early drafts of story.
It also suspection, but they may have multiple options for player when game was more RPG-like, where for example, you may choose who die or who become traitor.
And don't forget that this is only information of late RPG-early RTS part of development. There also was beta,that was much clother to finish, but still hell lot of things was changed during it, like music was comleatly changed
My favorite beta track is this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCuUhITZum0
It like full of atmosphere of warcraft between 2 and 3, in times of Lord of the Clans, I really like this atmopsphere.

>also the reason why they decided to not add any more races was due to balancing issues. Goblins were supposed to be a playable race in RoC too but they decided to not add anymore races because it would've been a mess to balance.

If say short, RoC was a total mess - one of thos games that had horrible development cycle and we end with not complete version of game, where a lot of things and ideas scrapped.
TFT was unfinished, they even done one of the cinematics it almost in-game graphics. Same time majority of team already worked on finishing WoW.

Honestely, I don't dream about "what if goblins" become playable faction. I also don't really understand how you may put burning legion as standart playable faction. However, I really butthurt that naval part of game was cut. All shipyards for all factions models already was done. In game in campain for example Human and Undead shipyards presented and have full sets of all ships. They also have button icons to "build" them that unused. Night Evles have different ships and there also remained unused button for shipyards. Orcs if I remember correctly use goblin shipyard, but there models of their ships, even warcraft 2 dreadnoths, and there also a lot ship related stuff. I bet that in demo campain with exodus of horde, half of which was cut and moved as "additional campain" in TFT initialy involved tutorial how to fix and build and operate ships, and it was too obviously cut.
And for me, this is one of reasons why Nagas in TFT never made it to be fully playable race - their main power and specialisation meant to be water, and since all proper water gameplay was almost cut from game, whole idea to add them was scrapped, even so many units, buildings and even hero was created and playble in campain or as neutral ones.
For me, Naval stuff was one of most important memes of warcraft in 2nd game, where almost all maps even in campain is islands and ships have dedicated resourse for them: "oil".

>>7905

>I'm not even sure "I panicked" is the right wording per se, but pretty much something along those lines of your judgment maybe being impaired from overworking or whatever.

Note on impaired judgement:
Do not say you were drunk or anything that is the result of you taking something – not even medication. Voluntary intoxication invalidates your state as taking something involves you acknowledging potential risk. Nothing that can specifically be YOUR fault. The classic case here involves a woman with depression absent-mindedly committing shoplifting as her mental awareness was reduced, she got off as their was no intent.

I use panic as a primer as that route is impossible to argue against and not the result of any conscious decision of the defendant. It's not magic but it mitigates.

>>7908

>I've been reading anything I can ever since. From what I understand it's out of the store's hands, and now completely up to the police? Which confused me. I should look into that more. Thanks man

It's a criminal law matter so it's out of the stores hands but police and prosecution hold discretion and they have large caseloads. This case holds little public interest, if you’re remorseful and the store accepts an apology then it’s liable to disappear after a chat.

That would be ideal as you can escape this going onto a criminal record meaning you can keep your job.

>>7909
This is correct and universal. For those Legally Blonde fans out there, this is what all the legal dialogue in that movie concerned.

Crime has two fundamental elements:
Mens rea is the guilty mind
+
Actus reas is the guilty act

If one of those wasn't present then (with limited exception for negligence) there is no crime. In Criminal Law this makes prosecution difficult as the burden of proof is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

Won't even go to court in a case of shoplifting (unless you’re clearly taking the piss) if you never admit to anything. The gorilla they have on security thumps his chest because he wants to cow you into submission but he's actually powerless. And now you can guess as to why a criminal record poses problems for a legal career.