>>5868

>It's terrible that making something "for kids" would be used as an excuse to do do a lousy job. Children need to be exposed to high quality cartoons when they're really young so they develop good taste.

Well, in therms of actual soviet country, it was only place for many and many artists, where their art won't be destoyed by bulldozers if you know what I mean X--DDD

Sometimes it did realy well thought, like this clips that was inside "Trreashure island" cartoons was pretty fun and in style you neet see often in soviet screens.

Famous post-ussr captian pronin with all his mems was another clear product of it's time that was fun to watch. All this cartoon with meraphorical memes is actually how very sharp changes of country and culture feels like.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XFHut4Pb1g

>I do think the ugly style can work in certain situations, like Rugrats, for instance. It was about babies, and babies kind of see the world distorted, so the art had a purpose.

I agree, that certain ugly styles and very unusual stylisations are great part of some awesome pieaces of independed animation. However it not all need be done such way. In nickalodean it feels like they at FIRST was liberal, then after first generations of cartoons that was "ugli" they relised that "ugli is popular". So they shut down all liberality and just proposed "MAKE UGLI CARTOONS" or something like that. And honestely, I don't like this at all.

True liberal is when you see different, or if it impossible, slightly different styles of art. Like I think we all know original Heavy Metal cartoon.

>>5424
What kills imageboards is a lack of QUALITY posters, and hordes of shitposters drive them away.

Let me ask you something, when is the last time you heard anyone mention 4chans /b/? When is the last time you ever even thought about it? Do you even actually still consider it to be a living or dead board? Now that you think of it, does a part of you actually imagine no one must post there anymore?

Hordes of cancerous faggot shitposters killed KC. It killed 4kanker /b/. It eventually destroyed most of 4kanker. It also killed old EC. It is literally cancer. The unrestricted growth of useless cells that serve no other function than to multiply themselves until it kills the host.

>>5426
This retard is an excellent case in point. Shitposters eventually drown out all discussions and flood good threads off the board with their unrestricted--sometimes knowingly deliberate--shitposting. It destroys the community utterly. That is why KC literally no longer exists. They are an infection in human form.

The final stages are when it's so cancerous, so awful, so terminal, that even the shitposters themselves cannot wallow in their own filth anymore. A very good example of this is 8kanker's /kc/. That board is literally a dead board. The last time I went there it was such SHIT I couldn't believe me eyes. You see, shitposters cannot exist in a vacuum. They can only continue to exist by attaching themselves to a healthy host. There they drag quality down and begin to multiply, until they have outnumbered all good posters who simply stop posting.

Pic related. They are the faggots that ruin the hobby. Then by the time the original group is not even a memory, they too abandon all pretenses of being there to enjoy the hobby to begin with leaving nothing. They are like locusts.

>>4556
I'm talking about the way business links are maintained. In China businesses tends to be cutthroat* but in Africa the focus is instead on maintaining trust and long-term relationships in the absence of law-bound written contracts. Think of it in the same fashion as how important honour was to people in old American westerns.

You see it throughout the film when, for example, he deals with farmers supplying food with constant accusations of them selling him sick animals (the documentary is a comedy remember). The ending saga especially makes this clear when Yang must get supply chain information from his gravel contact which he is reluctant to provide for fear that Yang is trying to fuck him. Only Eddy is able to save the day by giving his word that they aren't out to cut him from his business.

The ending scene then has Yang, after securing a big contract for stone, deciding to measure the shipment on site being convinced the guy is cheating him. Even after they mend his lorry. Nevermind Africa, if you did that nonsense in Britain the guy would tell you to fuck off and I've seen that happen with builders when investors decide to get involved.

*They are after all regarded as the "Jews of Asia" especially in areas with a large expat community like Malaysia.

>>4564
It was kc-tier and it was on the ec.

Yang was a low-level manager in way over his head and unwilling to learn. That isn't some grand civilization battle, the core plot of the story is something older than history.

>>4580
I was actually just thinking this last night after watching crime videos, that thing often isn't so much why would somehow think to accuse you of a thing, but rather why it even occurs to the accuser that is a thing to do to begin with. I particularly see this with for example a certain cancerous board's shitposters who are well known for loosely flinging accusations around when a lot of the time they themselves are guilty of that very thing.

So just the fact that this guy is so paranoid they are trying to cheat him already indicates at the very minimum he comes from a culture where corner cutting, lies, and cheating are rampant and normal, if not that he himself would think to do such a thing. And it is in particularly poor judgment as well as poor taste because it makes people start to think in the back of their mind "no of course I am not trying to cheat you...wait why, are you thinking of cheating me?" I'm trying to remember the exact phrase but something along the lines that one of the first things a con artist does is making some talk about being afraid people are trying to con him. You treat people how you expect to be treated and largely model others on an internal model of yourself and your own motivations. This creates that "I'd have done the same to you/you'd have done the same to me" mentality which fundamentally undercuts a certain sense of trust outside of extremely high risk high margin activity like the black market, which is also more likely to involve people who will straight up kill you even over something comparatively petty so you plan accordingly. Meanwhile bringing a gun to a contract negotiation in Western business would be absurd, and much more likely to look like you're trying to threaten them rather than you feeling threatened.

All of which just further paints the Chinese as absolutely unscrupulous cheats and swindlers regardless of this guy's intentions. So yeah I wouldn't feel like doing jack shit for someone like that and not just from feeling insulted.

It also reminds me of my favorite screencap story I saw posted to KC awhile ago. And literally anybody who's dealt with the Chinese in any way ever can confirm this. It got to the point where I would deliberately go out of my way to make absolutely certain nothing I was buying on eBay was ever getting shipped from China and preferably never made by Chinese either. Not out of nationalism but because I would rather deal with literal African bushman than actually having to put up with dealing with the Chinese. One of the more hilariously fucked things I got was a "flashlight" that was in fact a multicolor blinking LED Christmas light thing.

"the" typically designates singular or a title.

For example:
Jesus Christ is THE son of God

or

Jesus Christ is A son of God

Do you see how the different article renders those subtly but completely different meanings? If Jesus is simply "a" son of God it implies that there are or could be other sons of God. It denotes more a type of status or categorization. THE indicates it as more of a title, for example "the heavy weight champ" specifies a specific individual, "a heavy weight champ" is more general and categorical. Saying about a specific day that "the day was rainy" indicates that that specific day was rainy. Just saying "a day was rainy" doesn't indicate which specific day. "injustice critic" unless it is a specific name or title as in channel "InjusticeCritic" would sound like "an injustice critic" as in a job or profession. "the injustice critic" is referring to a specific channel or person. If you were speaking generally, like "the job of the injustice critic" is speaking in that case specifically of the professional in that profession.

So OP with your phrasing I honestly could not even tell at first if you meant it as a channel or title of someone's job except

>It is a title of the russian youtube channel.

Saying it that way implies that this youtube channel has more than one title of name.

If it is the name of a channel you capitalize it or in case of internet things write it as is (like for example "moot" stole his mom's credit card, not Moot). If the name of the channel is simply youtube/watchrtw45t4st#injusticecritic I suppose, maybe it could go either way? I guess it would simply be "injusticecritic". If a screen name is CatSpoon you would say it's simply CatSpoon like "and this is Dmitri" not "the Dmitri" just Dmitri. Unless it was like a man of notoriety or someone you specifically meant to separate out, like "oh you mean THE Dmitri Dmitroslav is here?"

>>4851
If it has already been established that it is a youtube channel or screen name yeah. Or "the channel injusticecritic" or simply "injusticecritic on youtube"