Stupid joke that can be applyed to 1990s, today everywhere playing their most new hyped crap and most new movies and trends. for a decade now.
>It's just that for once I can actually run a really modern nice looking game, for the most part.
Well, if you get NEW hardware, which hope not run on "russian time" and it's really new, not old stock GTX750ti, GTA is odd choise for a game.
>It has already been brought up by multiple people that they pretty much got bored of it compared to SA, including Ireland who said he hasn't bothered with GTA IV. For someone as picky as you are about games, one would think you'd understand.
GTA5 not offers a lot of good compare San Andres, while same time trying to "replicate" it. It get "bigger" but feels "less". If you already played most of previous GTA titles, you'll not find anything really new in 5.
I wonder how it to live without any amount of abstract thinking.
So that it was not aimed for kids. However GTA3 very arcaedy and more close to actual 2d titles. With every next game untill 4 at least they taked direction to be more far from it.
>How best usage of physics? If you mean Valve tier "we want to show off our new engine" then meh. Problem with those things is they get dated super fast. As for 4th one I just never heard a lot about it honestly
4 used Euthoria physics protocols at maximum, I guess. It's not get dated since 90% of games nowdays not past very ver from 2004 version Havok physics engine. https://youtu.be/GWVtZJo-HqI
>Yeah but at the same time it often just felt like memery.
This game is not SUPER SERIOUS of cource, but it not saying it is bad at plot. Some cheesy big plot, developers gived it reasonbale amount of time and patience unlike 3 where was no plot and Vice City where it was "some stuff from scarface".
>You know, you really need to work on not being an insulting twat for no reason dude. I don't think you are even aware of how much you do it, and start trying to talk down to people. You do realize you're talking to the same person you were basically just agreeing with regarding difference of hand painted vs early 3D things, right?
I don't know what I talking with because this is "anonymous" imageboard. Only reason you know who I'am because other russian poster not that much active nowdays and there not too much people to make it really anonimous. That's said, I judging not real people, who I know or should know - I talk and give my comment on actual phrases and words. I think it is kind of objective that way. Of cource nobody should take close to the heart somethnig that was written on ffs anonomous imageboard. I think that an approach "I don't like games, it's boring, I'am only playing it with frens because frends are fun who the fuck neeed this videogames anyway" is not something I can count as intellectual. Besides, you not answered last posts in this disscution about graphics, so it might be not you at all.
>You are what we like to call here a "fart sniffer," because you like smell of own farts. You do not realize not everyone enjoys you making room smell like shit wherever you go, that not everyone enjoys sniffing their own farts, much less others.
Fart sniffer is "lowest" rank in local prison ieararchy, I don't know it's even exist or it is some sort of just rumors, what can be lower than a "Rooster". However if you don't want hear any comments or opinions on your post.. well, just write in actual post, I don't know, like "I'am sensetive person no bully pls" idk. I not typing anything I not expecting I recive in answer.
>With GTA in particular no, it's not as much fun without playing it on a console with others.
"Fun" is not objective meashure. I can't describe anything by such world without concretisation of mine personal esperience in enough quantities. Only thing I can answer is to describe person by what he think is "fun". Currently maybe I don't had enough information, but it is again, anonomous imageboard, not discord server or something.
>Elder Scrolls/Morrowind stuff itself is pretty bydlo. I personally haven't even played those games and they often appear too much like the most YOBA tier mainstream bydlo of any APRG out there. So how's them apples?
Older games now on some knowlege only because newer ones. 90% playing skyrim or started from it. Of cource, because they such mega popular - people trying older ones. Oblivion and Morrowind of hit of it's day, but if series ended at Morrowind it'll be no more remember than I don't know, Arx Fatalis or Gothic 2. Older games - even much more goes in obscure territory. Daggerfall is unfinished experiment that get some attention in 1996 mainly for it's evolution of stil fresh ARPG genre in 3d engine, Battlespire and Redguard was flops. Arena - one of many low budget clons of ultima unerworld, based on other low budget clone Legends of Valour which nobody remebers, and Arena with it's cheapness, obscurety and poor sales now'd be compleatly forgotten, if not it's sequels. Same as bethesda terminator games. Or bethesda racing games. Or 95% CRPG to say, even ones that actually great games.
I'am not happy at all too, that fans of Fallout 4 and Skyrim sometimes turn their attention to older games,since most often after playing it for 5 minutes they thought it's "garbage" and then saying everyone that it's garbage and that oyu should try play new ZeniMax elder Scrolls MMO instead.
>I can't sit there in front of PC with people and I don't hang out with people IRL these days much either.
So why you need console, since you don't hang out anymore? Tbh better be just call friend with laptop, and lie on sofa together with to laptops playing some turn based game.
>My PC monitor and keyboard is on the floor. I don't even have a good chair or desk for it. Hence, why I asked about the multiplayer, because I can actually play a multiplayer PC game, although I still think playing a fighting game like MK not as hanging out with people is pretty stupid because that's the entire design of those games.
For classic emulated MK games you can place controller buttons everywhere on keyboard. Crap, you can buy two gamepads and connect PC to you TV with same result, we are not in time where you got VIC-20 with only one joystick port or something.
>You completely and entirely missed the point of the post then. I was asking if it was a fun game to play by myself and whether there was a good multiplayer side to it, and because it was amazing when your car door could get ripped off in earlier GTA games and how now I find it pretty cool being able to shoot through a windshield to kill the driver, for instance, or all the neat new physics stuff. Also, because it just plain looks good. I am not "testing" anything you fool.
Well for me it not looks that abovie GTA4, exept some light effects on maximum - faces and characters on same level. Most of physics grounded to level of san andres with cars because they wanted more arceady gameplay. Only problem with GTA 4 it's perfomance,
>I am not "testing" anything you fool.
readed it by "OG Loc" voice lol, no offence