National Socialism is a concrete ideology with exactly one historical example, and which is ironically called "Socialism" in the name but is used to typify right wing extremism, and so it's really got little to do with right vs left ultimately.
A better example would be to say it's like trying to compare something as religious vs atheist because you see the same vagueries. Like what would you call Buddhism then that doesn't believe in God? How would you typifiy the New Agers and spiritualists or people that say "I ams spiritual" without ascribing to an organized religion? Really it's just down to the cancerousness of an Americanism because when people say right winger vs leftist what they are really talking about is through that cancerous lens of generalizations, exactly how it would be to talk about "religious" which also is unspokenly using American version of Christianism as opposed to say being a Sufi Muslim, or in talking the various permutations of Christianity. In your example to call something National Socialist is effectively the same as saying you are a Wahhabi or a Catholic, in which case it is a concrete definition and broad assumptions about other things are indeed possible because you are now talking the core canon of something firmly established.>>54481
No, no he is entirely and utterly correct in what he just said and it's largely cancerous Ameriganism in kulturkampf. Like for one example I am pretty hardcore about my environmentalism and concern for climate change. You would then falsely infirm I am somehow sympathetic towards the gay agenda or have an antipathy towards gun rights, which I am not. I try not to talk politics with Americans in particular because they immediately make those fucking retarded assumptions, like somehow because I am full on murica bear about muh gun rights I am somehow going to agree with your absolutely fucking retarded ideas about burning masks.
Moreover this isn't tied just to place but also to time, because what word does conservationism sound like? Oh yeah that's right, we did
actually fucking care about conservation as Conservatives before, back in the times of Teddy Roosevelt, and back when Communism was associated with industrialization and "progress" and "change" and ripping nature the fuck apart whereas die Wald held a special place among the Nazis.
So yes A is meaningless in its implications towards C. Somebody can say they are an atheist and still hate the gay. Somebody else can say they are religious and believe in gay marriage somehow. It does not always follow and in fact you are much more likely to get a warped view of people agreeing with you about everything anyways because some people on the street might just nod their heads along because they don't feel like having a big ass argument at the metro about why you, as a religious fundamentalist, despise gun "rights" and think it's your religious duty to get all guns confiscated because of muh childrens. It doesn't even work in America which is the one place muh left vs muh right could even work more often than not. Like I've seen hardcore trumper 60 year old ladies hanging out with other old black women. I've seen neonazis despise Trump for well obvious Jewish reasons. I've likewise seen some (though admittedly not many) black people be serious MAGA supporters. Generalizations do not work unless they are super specific, in which case it stops being as much of a generalization.>>54483
Imageboards got hijacked by retards from stormfront and later Fox "news." Most of the people on imageboards today are literally boomers from reddit and twitter or their idiotic zoomer grandkids. Next to no oldfags exist on 4chan. This was a generational shift and a shift in the type of people posting there. Very few oldfags actually went full retard like these kids did.